<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">

    <title type="text">Culture Making items tagged debt</title>
    <subtitle type="text">Culture Making:Main column content</subtitle>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.culture-making.com/author/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.culture-making.com/tag/atom/" />
    <updated>2008-11-21T22:39:26Z</updated>
    <rights>Copyright (c) 2008, Nate Barksdale</rights>
    <generator uri="http://www.pmachine.com/" version="1.6.4">ExpressionEngine</generator>
    <id>tag:culture-making.com,2008:11:21</id>


    <entry>
      <title>Inshallah</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.culture-making.com/post/inshallah/" />
      <id>tag:culture-making.com,2008:author/9.1001</id>
      <published>2008-11-21T15:30:46Z</published>
      <updated>2008-11-21T22:39:26Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Nate Barksdale</name>
            <email>natebarksdale@gmail.com</email>
                  </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        
						
			

			
<div class="author" style="font-size: -1">"<a href="http://ideas.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/31/in-meltdown-islamic-banks-are-doing-ok/">In Meltdown, Islamic Banks Are Doing O.K.</a>," a <a href="http://ideas.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/31/in-meltdown-islamic-banks-are-doing-ok/">NYTimes.com Ideas Blog</a> post, 31 October, 2008</div><hr />		
		<p><b>Finance | </b>Too bad nobody in the West thought of it: Islamic banking is better weathering the meltdown because sharia law curbs excessive risk-taking, with bans on interest and trading in debt. The strictures on usury mean investments only in “productive enterprises.” [<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/30/AR2008103004434.html">Washington Post</a>]
</p>
		

	
			
			
			
		
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>The unspoken code of debt</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.culture-making.com/post/the_unspoken_code_of_debt/" />
      <id>tag:culture-making.com,2008:author/9.547</id>
      <published>2008-11-21T15:30:46Z</published>
      <updated>2008-11-21T22:39:26Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Nate Barksdale</name>
            <email>natebarksdale@gmail.com</email>
                  </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        
						
			

					<b>Andy: </b><em>“How could I not link to a column that so eloquently describes the way that culture creates "the horizons of the possible"? Brooks is spot on. Now the culture-making question: what cultural goods could we shape or create that would change "the culture of debt"?”</em><br />		
		<p>Individuals don’t build their lives from scratch. They absorb the patterns and norms of the world around them.
<br />
</p><p>
Decision-making — whether it’s taking out a loan or deciding whom to marry — isn’t a coldly rational, self-conscious act. Instead, decision-making is a long chain of processes, most of which happen beneath the level of awareness. We absorb a way of perceiving the world from parents and neighbors. We mimic the behavior around us. Only at the end of the process is there self-conscious oversight.</p><p>
According to this view, what happened to McLeod, and the nation’s financial system, is part of a larger social story. America once had a culture of thrift. But over the past decades, that unspoken code has been silently eroded.
<br />

</p><hr />
<div class="author" style="font-size: -1">from <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/22/opinion/22brooks.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=print">The Culture of Debt</a>, by David Brooks, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/">NYTimes.com</a>, 22 July 2008</div>		

	
			
			
			
		
      ]]></content>
    </entry>


</feed>