<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">

    <title type="text">Culture Making items tagged computers</title>
    <subtitle type="text">Culture Making:Main column content</subtitle>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.culture-making.com/author/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.culture-making.com/tag/atom/" />
    <updated>2009-01-07T16:07:34Z</updated>
    <rights>Copyright (c) 2009, Andy Crouch</rights>
    <generator uri="http://www.pmachine.com/" version="1.6.4">ExpressionEngine</generator>
    <id>tag:culture-making.com,2009:01:07</id>


    <entry>
      <title>The stream&#45;of&#45;consciousness discipline</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.culture-making.com/post/the_stream_of_consciousness_discipline/" />
      <id>tag:culture-making.com,2009:author/9.1138</id>
      <published>2009-01-07T10:50:34Z</published>
      <updated>2009-01-07T16:07:34Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Andy Crouch</name>
            <email>andy@culture-making.com</email>
                  </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        
						
			

			<b>Nate: </b><em>“The irony of this particular lament is the the guiding metaphor for reading text on computer screens is, in fact, the scroll. So it's really simply just a matter of making one's self write without editing.”</em><br />
<div class="author" style="font-size: -1">"<a href="http://ideas.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/08/computer-beats-kerouac-man/">Computer Beats Kerouac, Man</a>," a <a href="http://ideas.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/08/computer-beats-kerouac-man/">NYTimes.com Ideas blog</a> post, 8 December 2008 :: scroll video from <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmyS1EEVFbs">WBUR</a></div><hr />		
		<p align="center"><object width="420" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WmyS1EEVFbs&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WmyS1EEVFbs&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="420" height="340"></embed></object></p><p><b>Literature |</b> How would Jack Kerouac cope with Microsoft Word? Not very well, a blogger <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/booksblog/2008/dec/02/jack-kerouac-on-the-road-manuscript">imagines</a>, for “the birth of the computer has led, largely, to the death of the genuine stream of consciousness novel.” It “allows us to delete, shift sections around and continually edit, in the way that Kerouac, writing on his lengthy scrolls [for “On the Road"], could not.” [<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/booksblog/2008/dec/02/jack-kerouac-on-the-road-manuscript">Guardian</a>]
<br />

</p>
		

	
			
			
			
		
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Network ≠ community</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.culture-making.com/post/network_community/" />
      <id>tag:culture-making.com,2009:author/9.1104</id>
      <published>2009-01-07T10:50:34Z</published>
      <updated>2009-01-07T16:07:34Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Andy Crouch</name>
            <email>andy@culture-making.com</email>
                  </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        
						
			

					<b>Nate: </b><em>“Do ever-more-accurate computerized recommendation engines make culture more diverse or just more diverse-seeming? Do they bring people together or just seem to? As with most cool things once you think about them a bit more, it depends.”</em><br />		
		<p align="center"><b>VII</b></p><p>Recommender systems can increase the experience of diversity. By drawing attention to items individuals have not found by themselves, they can lead to new experiences. But individual diversity is different from overall diversity. Some systems can increase both individual and overall diversity. Other systems increase individual diversity but, at the same time, prompt consumers to be increasingly similar to each other. Their selections then come from an increasingly narrow range of items....<p align="center"><b>XI</b></p><p>The word “community” is widely used in conjunction with recommender systems, but they do little to build communities. Their use is essentially an individual, isolated act. Groups and networks are as important in the creation and experience of culture as individuals. Recommender systems will play a role in how culture is experienced, but they are not necessarily a strong force pushing us either towards or away from a healthy culture.</p><p align="center"><b>XII</b></p><p>Recommender systems only filter culture, in various ways; the point is to create environments in which culture can prosper.
<br />

</p><hr />
<div class="author" style="font-size: -1">from "<a href="http://whimsley.typepad.com/whimsley/2008/11/theses-on-netflix.html">Theses on Netflix</a>," by Tom Slee, <a href="http://whimsley.typepad.com/whimsley/2008/11/theses-on-netflix.html">Whimsley</a>, 24 November 2008 :: thanks Koranteng</div>		

	
			
			
			
		
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Unix, five hundred years on</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.culture-making.com/post/unix_five_hundred_years_on/" />
      <id>tag:culture-making.com,2009:author/9.640</id>
      <published>2009-01-07T10:50:34Z</published>
      <updated>2009-01-07T16:07:34Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Andy Crouch</name>
            <email>andy@culture-making.com</email>
                  </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        
						
			

					<b>Nate: </b><em>“We simply can't know which of our cultural offerings will be lasting, and which will quickly fade away. I think, actually, there's something good to be found in that tension, allowing us to work and create with foresight, care and seriousness, but also with a humble lightness, a willingness to let go.”</em><br />		
		<p>Very few infrastructure details begin with the idea that they will last 1,000 years. Strange as it sounds it is very likely that some basic software running inside computers  today will be running in computers 500 years from now. We see that conservation in cells, where very primitive metabolic cycles present in archaic cells are still operating in cells today. All the fancy “recent” improvements run upon them. One could imagine that in 5 centuries, parts of unix will be found operating in servers.  But it is clear that no one would be more surprised than the creators of unix. Most creations, including software, are written in less than optimal conditions. Creators always have the idea that they will go back later to fix the many known imperfections. Of course they are never fixed because the shipped rev is “good enough” — and so the temporary good enough becomes a permanent good enough.
</p><hr />
<div class="author" style="font-size: -1">from "<a href="http://blog.longnow.org/2008/08/13/temporary-becomes-permanent/">Temporary Becomes Permanent</a>," by Kevin Kelly, <a href="http://blog.longnow.org/2008/08/13/temporary-becomes-permanent/">The Long Now Blog</a>, 13 August 2008</div>		

	
			
			
			
		
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Skyscrapers not to scale</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.culture-making.com/post/skyscrapers_not_to_scale/" />
      <id>tag:culture-making.com,2009:author/9.581</id>
      <published>2009-01-07T10:50:34Z</published>
      <updated>2009-01-07T16:07:34Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Andy Crouch</name>
            <email>andy@culture-making.com</email>
                  </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        
						
			

			<b>Nate: </b><em>“Of course in this rendering, Asia -- where the real population-concentration action's happening -- is just a bunch of spikes on the horizon.”</em><br />
<div class="author" style="font-size: -1">a <a href="http://blog.longnow.org/2008/07/13/data-globes/">post</a> by Alexander Ross, <a href="http://blog.longnow.org/">The Long Now Blog</a>, 13 July 2008</div><hr />		
		<p align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/arenamontanus/375127836/in/set-72157594509798466/"><img src="http://www.culture-making.com/media/375127836_24ef15f878_420.jpg"></a></p>
<p>I recently came across these amazing data driven globes from <a href="http://gecon.yale.edu/">Yale’s G-Econ group</a>.  The one above represents population density, but their tool allows for <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/arenamontanus/sets/72157594509798466/">all kinds of data to drive the topology</a> from average rainfall to distance from coastlines.
<br />
<br />
</p>

		

	
			
			
			
		
      ]]></content>
    </entry>


</feed>